TWITTER FILES Pt. 17 - Statement to Congress - THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
By Matt Maibbi https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/
Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1633830002742657027
1. TWITTER FILES:
Statement to Congress
THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxnvlVXgAAxYGN?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
2. “MONITOR ALL TWEETS COMING FROM TRUMP'S PERSONAL ACCOUNT/BIDEN'S PERSONAL ACCOUNT”
When #TwitterFiles reporters were given access to Twitter internal documents last year, we first focused on the company, which at times acted like a power above government.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxxXXoXsAAlT1c?format=jpg&name=large
3. But Twitter was more like a partner to government.
With other tech firms it held a regular “industry meeting” with FBI and DHS, and developed a formal system for receiving thousands of content reports from every corner of government: HHS, Treasury, NSA, even local police:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxxdXzWcAEkhQF?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxyQthWYAI6KCw?format=jpg&name=large
4. Emails from the FBI, DHS and other agencies often came with spreadsheets of hundreds or thousands of account names for review. Often, these would be deleted soon after.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxyVQMWYAAqhYU?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxyawDXwAI_MuU?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqxzvwCWwAAndpK?format=jpg&name=large
5. Many were obvious “misinformation,” like accounts urging people to vote the day after an election.
But other official "disinfo" reports had shakier reasoning. The highlighted Twitter analysis here disagrees with the FBI about accounts deemed a "proxy of Russian actors":
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqxz0WIWYAA1FDc?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqxz2JRWAAAHZWJ?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqxz6sJWcAEyJl8?format=jpg&name=medium
6. Then we saw "disinfo" lists where evidence was even less clear. This list of 378 “Iranian State Linked Accounts” includes an Iraq vet once arrested for blogging about the war, a former Chicago Sun-Times reporter and Truthout, a site that publishes Noam Chomsky.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx0Fc1WwAMmKfR?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx0K7XXoAAIPRS?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx0O8ZXsAA89CZ?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx0S2KXsAAKw1W?format=jpg&name=large
7. In some cases, state reports didn't even assert misinformation. Here, a list of YouTube videos is flagged for “anti-Ukraine narratives”:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx1WygX0AATG2x?format=jpg&name=large
9. Asked if Twitter's marketing department could say the company detects “misinfo” with help of “outside experts,” a Twitter executive replied:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx1cjnWIAEj2z_?format=jpg&name=large
11. Who's in the Censorship-Industrial Complex? Twitter in 2020 helpfully compiled a list for a working group set up in 2020.
The National Endowment for Democracy, the Atlantic Council's DFRLab, and Hamilton 68's creator, the Alliance for Securing Democracy, are key:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx1z0BXoAAnarv?format=jpg&name=large
12. Twitter execs weren't sure about Clemson's Media Forensics Lab (“too chummy with HPSCI”), and weren't keen on the Rand Corporation (“too close to USDOD”), but others were deemed just right.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx12cKWAAA1pIW?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx15qHWwAEG2X7?format=jpg&name=large
13. NGOs ideally serve as a check on corporations and the government. Not long ago, most of these institutions viewed themselves that way. Now, intel officials, “researchers,” and executives at firms like Twitter are effectively one team - or Signal group, as it were:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3O7kWIAAfxLx?format=jpg&name=900x900
14. The Woodstock of the Censorship-Industrial Complex came when the Aspen Institute - which receives millions a year from both the State Department and USAID - held a star-studded confab in Aspen in August 2021 to release its final report on “Information Disorder.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3SALWcAQ3si2?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3SBJWcAAr8Vp?format=png&name=large
15. The report was co-authored by Katie Couric and Chris Krebs, the founder of the DHS's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Yoel Roth of Twitter and Nathaniel Gleicher of Facebook were technical advisors. Prince Harry joined Couric as a Commissioner.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3V9DXgAAdpJp?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3V-FXoAMgnCb?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3V_NXwAA-7sn?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
16. Their taxpayer-backed conclusions: the state should have total access to data to make searching speech easier, speech offenders should be put in a “holding area," and government should probably restrict disinformation, “even if it means losing some freedom.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3Z3HWwAI8sSj?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3Z4uX0AwCi1s?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3Z5yWYAASJ47?format=jpg&name=large
17. Note Aspen recommended the power to mandate data disclosure be given to the FTC, which this committee just caught in a clear abuse of office, demanding information from Twitter about communications with (and identities of) #TwitterFiles reporters.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3dXSXoAAVEsN?format=png&name=small
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Weaponization_Select_Subcommittee_Report_on_FTC_Harrassment_of_Twitter_3.7.2023.pdf
18. Naturally Twitter's main concern regarding the Aspen report was making sure Facebook got hit harder by any resulting regulatory changes:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3fKVWIAEBfE6?format=jpg&name=large
19. The same agencies (FBI, DHS/CISA, GEC) invite the same “experts” (Thomas Rid, Alex Stamos), funded by the same foundations (Newmark, Omidyar, Knight) trailed by the same reporters (Margaret Sullivan, Molly McKew, Brandy Zadrozny) seemingly to every conference, every panel.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3oY4WIAILP4z?format=png&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx3tJHXoAIPhjN?format=jpg&name=large
21. While Twitter sometimes pushed back on technical analyses from NGOs about who is and isn't a “bot,” on subject matter questions like vaccines or elections they instantly defer to sites like Politifact, funded by the same names that fund the NGOs: Koch, Newmark, Knight.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx4LT5WwAEla5l?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx4NnZWIAIYfA2?format=jpg&name=large
22. #TwitterFiles repeatedly show media acting as proxy for NGOs, with Twitter bracing for bad headlines if they don't nix accounts. Here, the Financial Times gives Twitter until end of day to provide a “steer” on whether RFK, Jr. and other vax offenders will be zapped.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx4Qm0WwAAF5AL?format=jpg&name=medium
24. The difference is, these campaigns are taxpayer-funded. Though the state is supposed to stay out domestic propaganda, the Aspen Institute, Graphika, the Atlantic Council's DFRLab, New America, and other “anti-disinformation” labs are receiving huge public awards.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx5shLWcAEU1VP?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx5siBWIAA35__?format=jpg&name=medium
25. Some NGOs, like the GEC-funded Global Disinformation Index or the DOD-funded Newsguard, not only seek content moderation but apply subjective “risk” or “reliability” scores to media outlets, which can result in reduction in revenue. Do we want government in this role?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx5v-rWAAEPsSv?format=jpg&name=large
26. Perhaps the ultimate example of the absolute fusion of state, corporate, and civil society organizations is the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), whose “Election Integrity Partnership” is among the most voluminous “flaggers” in the #TwitterFiles:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx50q8WIAQVp2z?format=png&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx50tLWYAM9HHW?format=jpg&name=large
29. According to the EIP's own data, it succeeded in getting nearly 22 million tweets labeled in the runup to the 2020 vote.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx6olNWwAEqDcB?format=jpg&name=large
30. It's crucial to reiterate: EIP was partnered with state entities like CISA and GEC while seeking elimination of millions of tweets. In the #TwitterFiles, Twitter execs did not distinguish between organizations, using phrases like “According to CIS[A], escalated via EIP.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx6qrtXsAINWv9?format=jpg&name=medium
31. After the 2020 election, when EIP was renamed the Virality Project, the Stanford lab was on-boarded to Twitter's JIRA ticketing system, absorbing this government proxy into Twitter infrastructure – with a capability of taking in an incredible 50 million tweets a day.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx6t6CWIAAkoWo?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx6t7SXsAIhOIx?format=jpg&name=large
32. In one remarkable email, the Virality Project recommends that multiple platforms take action even against “stories of true vaccine side effects” and “true posts which could fuel hesitancy.”
None of the leaders of this effort to police Covid speech had health expertise.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx8QJ4XsAAECnZ?format=jpg&name=large
35. DiResta has become the public face of the Censorship-Industrial Complex, a name promoted everywhere as an unquestioned authority on truth, fact, and Internet hygiene, even though her former firm, New Knowledge, has been embroiled in two major disinformation scandals.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx85oCWwAAVuHc?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx85pLXwAAPNoI?format=jpg&name=medium
37. DiResta's New Knowledge helped design the Hamilton 68 project exposed in the #TwitterFiles.
Although it claimed to track “Russian influence,” Hamilton really followed Americans like “Ultra Maga Dog Mom,” “Right2Liberty,” even a British rugby player named Rod Bishop:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9AiEXsAAlJE1?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9AjOWwAA_mu3?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9AkhWcAAtVBs?format=jpg&name=medium
39. As a result of Hamilton's efforts, all sorts of people were falsely tied in press stories to “Russian bots”: former House Intel chief Devin Nunes, #WalkAway founder @BrandonStraka, supporters of the #FireMcMaster hashtag, even people who used the term “deep state”:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9fHmWAAABblJ?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9fI6WcAIEtQ5?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx9fK7XsAMl22s?format=jpg&name=large
40. Hamilton 68 was funded by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, which in turn was funded by the German Marshall Fund, which in turn is funded in part by – the Department of State.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx-Ge0XoAAddry?format=png&name=900x900
41. The far worse scandal was “Project Birmingham,” in which thousands of fake Russian Twitter accounts were created to follow Alabama Republican Roy Moore in his 2017 race for US Senate.
Newspapers reported Russia seemed to take an interest in the race, favoring Moore.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx-O3VWwAI6C6w?format=jpg&name=medium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx_BraWAAIEozX?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx_Bs3XwAE-ncD?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx_BuFWIAEgHlP?format=jpg&name=large
43. Internally, Twitter correctly assessed the Moore story as far back as fall of 2017, saying it had no way if knowing if the Moore campaign purchased the bots, or if “an adversary purchased them… in an attempt to discredit them.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx_OXgWcAIdkn9?format=jpg&name=medium
44. Twitter told this to reporters who asked about the story contemporaneously. Moreover, after the story broke, Twitter's Roth wrote:
“There have been other instances in which domestic actors created fake accounts… some are fairly prominent in progressive circles.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqx_R94WwAA8XbM?format=jpg&name=large
46. Twitter stayed silent out of political caution. DiResta, who ludicrously claimed she thought Project Birmingham was just an experiment to “investigate to what extent they could grow audiences… using sensational news,” hinted at a broader reason.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqyA4QgXoAEizlb?format=png&name=900x900