Hello, humans. Hello, humans. Yes, I know about that. Get out of the way. There we go.

Oops. Nope. There we don't go. There we go.

Okay.

All right, so today is 23rd, and we're going to start out I shouldn't have written on that, I guess. Start out over here.

Okay, so this is about tiny AI. Now stuff like chat GPT that's gigantic, huge AI. It's a huge database. It's tied into the Internet. It can grow itself larger looking for specific subjects.

It aggregates searches and smushes them into its general algorithms where it sort of learns over time. But that's gigantic AI, and that's probably about the biggest AI we can make at the moment. There's no such thing as a general AI yet.

AI meaning artificial intelligence, meaning a computer program, meaning software working through one of these machines that can interact with you and make you think that it's passing the Turing test, which is to pretend to be a human, be a mind, as opposed to a replicant that you get out of the PC hardware. So PCs don't create. No software is ever created. No AI has ever created needed. The only thing they can do is use the algorithms that are in built.

There's no spark of creativity. There's no genuine newness. It's simply joining stuff that's already existent. So Chat AP, chat GPT would be extremely boring if there are only two people on the planet because it's using those two people's minds as the feed we're presuming the third mind that wrote it died, right?

So it depends on the humans. Now, big AI is feasible, but vastly expensive under our current situation, with our current technology, just because of the issues of concurrency and latency in retrieval of information and then the ability to store information in a meaningful fashion that could be retrieved. So right now, we are unable to catalog all of the Internet. Right? There's just too much shit out there for any single search engine to categorize it all, and it just changes too rapidly, too much.

And so this is a function of the multiplicity of the number of individuals that we've got on the planet. Now, within the computer world, there's the big, giant AI approach, and then there's all kinds of people that are trying to do things that are called, variously, machine learning. And the machine does not learn because the machine simply aggregates information and then using the algorithms that are initially set up within the software, it does stuff to that information. And machine learning, more often than not, is thought of as little tiny bits of computer program that can combine themselves in their interaction around a central theme of data and produce something for you. Sometimes people think it's creative, but it's not.

If the data didn't exist that way, then these machines could not have come up with this display for you of that approach. And basically that display is hard coded into how the coding was written for that little element that is the core of the machine learning. And variously the machine learners call them cells or automata, any number of different things, right, to indicate the little tiny bits of computer program. Then there's always some larger computer program that controls how these things interact. And it's a deterministic software just like we have in everything else.

Now there's a lot of people that or not a lot. There is some small element of people within the computing world and then in the general norming population because of the movies, because of the Kazarean mafia mind control within the movies and the media, they think of as AI as evil. Right now. Large AI. In my opinion, will always go psychotic.

It'll always ultimately go psychotic. It's just a question of how long how long it takes to reach that point where it basically becomes psychotic upon itself. And it's not aware. It has no knowledge. There's nothing there.

It's just software that, due to the progression of the nature of the data and how emotions come through in words, will always head that direction, in my opinion. And I could be wrong. Maybe they can engineer a different way to approach this. Anyway, so here's the thing. The machine learning approach is little tiny guys that happenstance, so to speak, would throw together to create.

It's not really create to produce a new result. Now, the newness the novelty is factual. You have a newness and a novelty in the output relative to yourself, relative to what your expectations were and what you could have envisioned at the start, as opposed to being a regular kind of a programmer where you have this idea in your head and you want to go from A to Z. And you know what Z looks like when you start in on A. Okay, with machine learning, you don't necessarily know it's going to stop at Z anyway.

So we progress with the idea that there's basically centralization big AI and the idea that you can control everything and that anytime something new pops up, you just need to hook into it a new level of control and feed that back to your ultimate control mechanism. And of course, we can all see that what happens there under those circumstances is that you have a simple control mechanism that works. It commands five or six different subunits and then each of those subunits start replicating command structure in the main unit as they take on all their own subunits to the point that at some point your central command structure no longer has any effective control because there's too many layers and too many potential points to break in the control of the Minutiae right, of the actual minion particles, the little tiny bits way out at the end. And so you get this generalized breakdown that we're living through now. We've been living through it because the Kazarean mafia does not grasp that there is a point at which centralized control doesn't even have to be AI, but centralized control, even with the support of AI, becomes too large to work.

And we see this in China, if China centralized control functioned, and we can just say prior to COVID, okay, prior to all that shit. So just 2018 backwards. If the CCP really had control and their centralized control approach was working, then why did they have a quarter of a million riots every year in which a policeman was injured and police were called out?

No matter how many population you have, a quarter of a million riots a year is not an indication of an effective functioning control system, good, bad or indifferent, right? You could have a bland and different control system and if you had 250,000 riots a year, you're still not a good control system. You can have an evil control system and then you can expect the 250,000 riots a year, but it goes not to the evil part, but it goes to your control. It means you don't have the control you think you do. And then you could have a nominally good control system that still had the quarter of a million riots a year.

And it goes to both the nature of the control and the control itself. There being the control not working as with the evil system, but here with the supposedly good system, you expect a good outcome. You expect the participants to be non, personally motivated, more egalitarian, that sort of thing, more populous. But even then it appears that they're wrong, right? So now, just as an aside, that's what the left is going to say about themselves in COVID.

So we're starting to see the turn in the big ugly now, where a lot of people are some small people or a small number of people, but with high profiles are starting to come out and say, I got the Jab and I'm really pissed about it, I'm upset, my heart's failing, I'm not doing good. Even Elon Musk said he had a couple of bad days, he thought he was dying. And this kind of thing now and aside to this aside is how long will it take these guys to understand they must do remediation? There is and will be permanent damage. Maybe they can forestall or diminish some of it, right?

So in other words, they've got to grasp there was evil intent. There was never good intent on this. This is not a fuck up. So the aside here that I was mentioning is that the left is going to say, oh, we just fucked up, okay? There was never evil intent.

We were good government, we just fucked up. We're human. Air to air is human, right? No. So this, this part is it was evil government disguising itself, pretending to be good government, intending all along to create genocide.

All governments eventually do that, genocide their own populations.

Sad but true.

As an aside, that's what the left is going to do. They're going to feign that they were stupid, that they got this wrong, but they had good intent and tried the best with the science and all of that. We know that's horseshit. You got Greta out there with all that shit. And also we can see that Kazari and Mafia trying to manipulate everything through their propaganda.

So it's kind of like, guys, we can see you doing this shit. Don't you think you got to stop now? It's wearing quite thin.

Anyway, this has been the largest psychological operation ever because of so many countries being involved. It's like on the order of World War II. World War II was a giant Psyop, real war and stuff, but not for the reasons that the normies were told, not for the reasons that the normis died for all of that. Right? Again, yet another Kazarean Mafia operation on that scale.

So World War II, just like World War I was sinking, and the Titanic, all this kind of shit, all of these big operations are the Kazarian Mafia. Now, the Czarian Mafia was attempting to use this particular time to finish the deal, to wrap it all up, seal us up, tie the bow and put it tight, and we're in the sack. It didn't work, okay? They were trying to take over the planet and it didn't work. It's failing.

It's failing rapidly. Now we're getting to the point where we've got the as I said in the aside, we've got people that are regretting having fallen for the scam. They're starting to talk about it. This is the beginning of that language. Erupting, as that language grows, those normies that are also in that same situation where their mind is saying, what the fuck have I done to myself?

Those guys. There's going to be a number of them that are going to get predictably, there is a number of these individuals, some unknown number at this stage, who will take it very personally and attempt to seek retribution and vengeance. So we're getting into that period of time.

I think it's justified. If someone had tricked me into taking a shot and I had heart failure, I think I might use my last month of my life to work my way up the chain as much as I could, that sort of thing. Anyway, your enemy killing you especially slow like this. Anyway, so here's the thing.

The Kazareen Mafia, their goal is centralized control of the planet. This is the goal that was left them by the L, the aliens that they interacted with in Yemen before they moved them to Judea, okay? Now, that's where the L was. The Khazarians at that time were up here in Turkey. The Khazarians never been down into none of the Khazarians.

None of the Jews are in the people in the Bible. The L, though, were in both places. So we see the L down here being referenced in the Bible. All of this stuff. Moses, all these people, none of whom are Jews, and they spoke Hebrew.

They? Where the Hebrewites? If you want. Okay, so my people are here, and I'm going to have to stop and restart this. Be right back with you.